If a bowl is claimed to be out of play after being agreed upon as in play, what should the skips do?

When a bowl is claimed to be out of play after both skips have previously agreed that it was in play, the most appropriate action is to agree to measure the bowl in question for resolution. This is essential as it promotes fairness and maintains the integrity of the game.

Measuring allows for an objective determination of the bowl's status, based on the rules of the game. An agreement to measure acknowledges that both sides may hold differing views about the bowl's in-play status but emphasizes the importance of using standardized procedures to resolve such disputes. This action not only provides clarity but also fosters good sportsmanship by showing that both skips are willing to resolve the situation amicably.

The other options do not effectively address the need for resolution based on a mutual agreement or established protocol. Declaring the bowl out without measurement would undermine the prior agreement and could lead to dissatisfaction and confusion. Relying on an umpire to make a decision can also be avoided in this instance, as the skips are capable of resolving the issue collaboratively through measurement. Finally, simply accepting the last statement made by one of the skips neglects the need for an objective resolution, which is essential in maintaining the flow and fairness of the game.