If an extra end results in a tie after the scores are level, what should be done?

In the context of bowls, when an extra end is played and it results in a tie after both teams have scored equally, the appropriate action is to play another extra end. This decision is rooted in the competitive nature of the sport, where teams are afforded the opportunity to determine a clear winner rather than leaving the match unresolved. Playing another extra end not only provides a chance to break the tie but also maintains the integrity of the game, allowing players to showcase their skills in a fair manner.

Declaring the game a draw would negate the competitive effort put forth by both teams, while renaming the players for a sudden death play could introduce unnecessary confusion and does not align with standard practices. Ending the competition without a winner similarly lacks fairness and does not reflect the essence of competitive play in bowls, where resolution through additional play is preferred in the case of a tie. Thus, opting to play another extra end adheres to the regulations and spirit of the game effectively.