What should happen if a team realizes their second player has played only one bowl after the first player has played their two bowls?

In the scenario where a team discovers that their second player has played only one bowl after the first player has completed their two bowls, the expectation is that the second player forfeits their right to play the remaining bowl. This aligns with the rules of the game, which dictate that each player must adhere to the correct sequence of play.

In a standard game of bowls, players are required to alternate turns, and each must play their designated number of bowls in sequence. If a player plays out of turn or incorrectly, it disrupts the flow of the game and violates the established rules. Therefore, once it is recognized that the second player did not play their required number of bowls, they lose the opportunity to play the remaining bowl for that end of play, reinforcing the integrity of the game and its rules.

This outcomes ensures that the game maintains its structural consistency and that all players follow the protocols in place for fair play. The other choices do not align with the rules that govern the game, as they either allow for a continuation of improper play or propose adjustments that are not permitted under the established guidelines.